Skip to content

Expert Parallelism Load Balancer (EPLB)

Overview

Expert balancing for MoE (Mixture of Experts) models in LLM (Large Language) serving is essential for optimal performance. Dynamically changing experts during inference can negatively impact TTFT (Time To First Token) and TPOT (Time Per Output Token) due to stop-the-world operations. Our solution aims to minimize the negative impacts caused by the operation.

vLLM Ascend provides two EPLB integration paths:

  • Model Runner V2 (MRv2) uses the upstream vLLM EPLB controller, configuration, policy, load window, and rearrangement lifecycle. Ascend adds an HCCL weight-transfer backend and the load_collection_phase extension.
  • Model Runner V1 (MRv1) retains the legacy vLLM Ascend dynamic, recording, and static EPLB modes.

The two paths use different switches and configuration schemas. Do not mix MRv1 environment variables or legacy fields with MRv2 EPLB configuration.

EPLB Effects

  • Reduced Latency: Dynamically balances expert loads to minimize TTFT and TPOT by distributing workloads evenly across experts.
  • Adaptive Scaling: Automatically adjusts to workload fluctuations while maintaining stable performance.

Support Scenarios

Models

EPLB applies only to MoE models that support expert parallelism and whose MoE quantization method exposes a complete expert-weight movement layout. Support also depends on the selected model runner and hardware generation.

Legacy MRv1 performance has primarily been verified on DeepSeek-V3.1/R1. The initial MRv2 model-level validation uses Qwen3-30B-A3B W8A8 with synchronous EPLB. Validate accuracy and performance with the target model, topology, and traffic before production deployment.

[!IMPORTANT] Ascend 950 Products does not support using EPLB with quant type "W4A8MXFP4", "W4A16", "W4A16MXFP4".

Model Runner V2 Weight Formats

The following table describes the MRv2 EPLB code paths. W8A8 has an in-tree model-level NPU regression. Other enabled formats require model-level validation on the target hardware before production use.

Weight format MRv2 EPLB Notes
BF16 / FP16 Enabled Uses the unquantized expert weights and biases.
W8A8 / W8A8 Dynamic Enabled Uses persistent per-expert weight and scale tensors.
W4A8 Enabled Uses persistent per-expert weight, scale, and scale-bias tensors.
W4A4 MXFP Enabled Ascend 950 products; keeps native ND expert tensors.
W8A8 MXFP Enabled Ascend 950 products; keeps native ND expert tensors.
W4A16 Rejected The expert-weight layout has not completed independent EPLB validation.
W4A16 MXFP Rejected The expert-weight layout has not completed independent EPLB validation.
W4A8 MXFP Rejected The expert-weight layout has not completed independent EPLB validation.

Model Runner V1 Quantization and Hardware

QuantType Supported Hardware
W8A8 / W8A8-Dynamic A2, A3
W4A8 (with fused MC2 enabled) A2, A3
MXFP4 Ascend 950 Products
MXFP8 Ascend 950 Products

Usage Recommendations

EPLB is not recommended in the following scenarios because the load-balancing benefit may not offset its runtime overhead:

  • P node workloads with input sequences shorter than 1024 tokens.
  • D node workloads where the number of experts per die is <= 8 (<= 16 on 950DT), or where the per-die load is below 128 tokens.

[!WARNING] Meeting the above conditions may lead to performance degradation. When there are around 8 experts per die, the EPLB benefit may be comparable to its overhead. Benchmark the actual workload and enable EPLB only after confirming a performance gain.

How to Use EPLB

Model Runner V2: Upstream Synchronous EPLB

Select MRv2 explicitly when the model or environment does not select it by default. Enable expert parallelism and upstream EPLB, and set use_async=false. The upstream default is asynchronous, which is not yet supported by MRv2 on Ascend.

export VLLM_USE_V2_MODEL_RUNNER=1
unset DYNAMIC_EPLB
unset EXPERT_MAP_RECORD

vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B \
  --tensor-parallel-size 16 \
  --enable-expert-parallel \
  --enable-eplb \
  --eplb-config.window_size 50 \
  --eplb-config.step_interval 50 \
  --eplb-config.num_redundant_experts 16 \
  --eplb-config.use_async false \
  --eplb-config.log_balancedness true \
  --eplb-config.log_balancedness_interval 1 \
  --additional-config '{"eplb_config":{"load_collection_phase":"all"}}'

MRv2 uses the upstream EPLBConfig fields:

Parameter Default Description
window_size 1000 Number of recent steps used for expert-load recording.
step_interval 3000 Interval between expert rearrangements.
num_redundant_experts 0 Number of redundant physical experts.
use_async true Must be set to false on Ascend MRv2.
policy default Upstream EPLB placement policy.
log_balancedness false Log expert balancedness metrics.
log_balancedness_interval 1 Interval between balancedness log entries.
communicator None Do not set this on Ascend; HCCL is selected automatically.

These fields may also be passed together as JSON through --eplb-config. They must not be placed in --additional-config for MRv2.

MRv2 Load Collection Phase

load_collection_phase is the only MRv2 EPLB field under additional_config.eplb_config. It controls which batch phases contribute to the upstream load window; it does not disable routing or MoE computation for non-matching batches.

Value Behavior Typical use
all Collect load from every batch. This is the default. General and mixed workloads.
prefill Collect only from batches containing at least one prefill request. Optimize prefill balance and TTFT.
decode Collect only from batches containing decode requests and no prefill request. Optimize decode balance and TPOT.

Classification is performed once per batch. A batch containing any prefill request is classified entirely as prefill; otherwise it is decode. A batch that does not match load_collection_phase does not contribute load and does not advance the EPLB load window. It still participates in the global EPLB scheduling and communication sequence so that data-parallel ranks remain synchronized.

For example, to collect only prefill load:

vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B \
  --enable-expert-parallel \
  --enable-eplb \
  --eplb-config.use_async false \
  --additional-config '{"eplb_config":{"load_collection_phase":"prefill"}}'

[!IMPORTANT] MRv2 currently supports synchronous EPLB only. It rejects legacy dynamic_eplb, recording/static-map fields, DYNAMIC_EPLB, and EXPERT_MAP_RECORD. It also rejects an explicitly selected communicator. The initial validated execution scope is eager mode with the standard non-fused MoE communication path. Validate graph, multi-node, speculative decoding, and other communication combinations independently before use.

Model Runner V1: Legacy EPLB

Legacy MRv1 EPLB has three usage modes:

Mode Config in eplb_config Env Variable
Dynamic EPLB dynamic_eplb: true DYNAMIC_EPLB=true
Recording (generate expert map) expert_map_record_path DYNAMIC_EPLB=true or EXPERT_MAP_RECORD=true
Static EPLB (load pre-recorded map) expert_map_path none required

[!IMPORTANT] For Dynamic EPLB and Recording modes, the env variable acts as a safety guard: setting dynamic_eplb: true in config alone is not enough — the assertion requires DYNAMIC_EPLB=true or EXPERT_MAP_RECORD=true. Static EPLB (loading a pre-recorded map via expert_map_path) does not require an env variable.

Dynamic EPLB

We need to add environment variable export DYNAMIC_EPLB="true" to enable vLLM-Ascend EPLB. Enable dynamic balancing with auto-tuned parameters. Adjust expert_heat_collection_interval and algorithm_execution_interval based on workload patterns. In the current version, we recommend using the following: policy of SwiftBalanceEplb(2).

Parameter Description Default
dynamic_eplb Enable dynamic EPLB. False
expert_heat_collection_interval Interval for collecting expert heat. 600
algorithm_execution_interval Interval for executing the balancing algorithm. 50
eplb_policy_type EPLB policy type. 2
num_redundant_experts Number of redundant experts. 0
eplb_heat_collection_stage Request stage used to collect expert heat. Available values: all, prefill, and decode. all
graph TB
   A[start] --> B(collect_heat)
   B --> C(execute_algorithm)
   C --> D(update_layer one by one)
   D --> B
   D --> F[termination upon service termination]
# D node or colocation
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-235B-A22 \
  --tensor-parallel-size 16 \
  --enable-expert-parallel \
  --additional-config '{ "eplb_config": {
    "dynamic_eplb": true,
    "expert_heat_collection_interval": 600,
    "algorithm_execution_interval": 50,
    "eplb_policy_type": 2,
    "num_redundant_experts": 16
    }}'

# P node
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-235B-A22 \
  --tensor-parallel-size 16 \
  --enable-expert-parallel \
  --additional-config '{ "eplb_config": {
    "dynamic_eplb": true,
    "expert_heat_collection_interval": 50,
    "algorithm_execution_interval": 5,
    "eplb_policy_type": 2,
    "num_redundant_experts": 16
    }}'
EPLB Policy Types

The eplb_policy_type parameter selects the balancing algorithm used during dynamic expert redistribution:

Value Policy Description
0 Random Randomly swaps experts between ranks. Suitable for basic testing only.
1 DefaultEplb Open-source EPLB algorithm. Adds redundant experts to the hottest, packs via balanced assignment with local constraint exchange.
2 SwiftBalanceEplb Optimized for low-bandwidth environments. Supports intra-node and inter-node expert redundancy, joint optimization of expert placement. (Recommended)
3 FlashLB Statistical method using sliding-window mean/variance/covariance of expert loads. Uses FlashTree layered search for optimal replica allocation and minimize_redeploy for incremental adjustment. Best for high-frequency load fluctuations.
Selective Expert Heat Collection

The eplb_heat_collection_stage option is intended for prefill-decode aggregation scenarios. Prefill requests usually process many tokens in one iteration, while decode requests usually process fewer tokens. As a result, the expert workload distribution can differ between the two stages. Collecting heat from both stages may hide the imbalance of the stage whose latency you want to optimize.

[!IMPORTANT] This section describes the MRv1-only eplb_heat_collection_stage field. MRv2 uses load_collection_phase as described above; the two fields have different batch-classification semantics and are not interchangeable.

Use eplb_heat_collection_stage to select the stage whose expert heat contributes to EPLB:

Value Behavior Typical use
all Collect expert heat from both prefill and decode iterations. General workloads; this is the default.
prefill Collect expert heat only from iterations classified as prefill. Optimize prefill workload balance and TTFT.
decode Collect expert heat only from iterations classified as decode. Optimize decode workload balance and TPOT.

Choose the stage according to the actual workload. The following values can be used as initial tuning guidance:

  • For workloads whose typical input sequence length is greater than 1024 tokens, start with prefill.
  • For workloads whose typical input sequence length is less than 1024 tokens but concurrency is greater than 1024, try decode or all.
  • For other or mixed workloads, benchmark all, prefill, and decode against the target TTFT or TPOT before choosing a setting.

These thresholds are empirical starting points rather than strict requirements. Production traffic distribution, concurrency, model configuration, and hardware topology can all affect the optimal stage.

For example, to collect only prefill heat:

export DYNAMIC_EPLB="true"

vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-235B-A22 \
  --tensor-parallel-size 16 \
  --enable-expert-parallel \
  --additional-config '{ "eplb_config": {
    "dynamic_eplb": true,
    "expert_heat_collection_interval": 600,
    "algorithm_execution_interval": 50,
    "eplb_policy_type": 2,
    "num_redundant_experts": 16,
    "eplb_heat_collection_stage": "prefill"
  }}'

To collect only decode heat, set:

{
  "eplb_config": {
    "dynamic_eplb": true,
    "eplb_heat_collection_stage": "decode"
  }
}

[!NOTE] Stage selection applies to dynamic EPLB heat collection. Internally, vLLM-Ascend classifies each forward iteration by comparing its padded scheduled token count with the maximum expected token count of a decode iteration. An iteration above the threshold is treated as prefill; an iteration at or below the threshold is treated as decode. Classification is therefore performed per forward iteration rather than per individual request.

When an iteration does not match the selected stage, its expert load is not accumulated and it does not advance the heat-collection interval. Once heat collection is complete, balancing calculation and layer-by-layer expert weight updates continue normally.

Static EPLB

[!WARNING] Static EPLB is scheduled for removal in v0.25.1.

Initial Setup (Record Expert Map)

We need to add environment variable export EXPERT_MAP_RECORD="true" to record expert map. Generate the initial expert distribution map using expert_map_record_path. This creates a baseline configuration for future deployments.

vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-235B-A22 \
  --tensor-parallel-size 16 \
  --enable-expert-parallel \
  --additional-config '{ "eplb_config": {
    "expert_map_record_path": "/path/to/eplb.json",
    "num_redundant_experts": 16,
    "expert_heat_collection_interval": 400,
    "algorithm_execution_interval": 30
  }}'
Subsequent Deployments (Use Recorded Map)

Load the pre-recorded expert map for consistent performance. This avoids recalculating distributions at runtime.

vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-235B-A22 \
  --tensor-parallel-size 16 \
  --enable-expert-parallel \
  --additional-config '{
    "eplb_config": {"expert_map_path": "/path/to/eplb.json"}
  }'

Critical Considerations

  1. Parameter Tuning:
  2. For MRv2, tune window_size and step_interval against the target workload. For MRv1, tune expert_heat_collection_interval and algorithm_execution_interval.
  3. num_redundant_experts must make (num_experts + num_redundant_experts) divisible by the expert-parallel size.

  4. Hardware Requirements:

  5. Ensure that all NPUs have identical memory capacity and compute capabilities.
  6. Network bandwidth must support expert redistribution traffic (≥ 10 Gbps recommended).
  7. shm needs to be mounted for container

  8. Monitoring & Validation:

  9. Track metrics: Search for [Expert Hotness] in the log. We will calculate the peak-to-average ratio of the load for each layer at different ranks, and then find their mean and maximum values. Current means actual peak-to-average ratio, update means estimated peak-to-average ratio after algorithm adjustment.
  10. Use vLLM monitor to detect imbalances during runtime.
  11. Always verify expert map JSON structure before loading (validate with jq or similar tools).